Emotion is held up as the source of what is good and valuable in human culture. Poetry, music, narrative, all these serve human emotion. Without this service, life is perceived to become devoid of meaning.
Brutalist architecture made of gray slabs of concrete, purposefully designed to minimize the human that stands inside of it is said to be emotionless but just that description is laden with emotion. It is central to any human perception of the world. So what is this thing that dominates our thinking even when we say it is absent? Should it be the pinnacle of human expression? If not, then what even could be?
Emotions are central to human action because they are guideposts that the mind rapidly generates. An impression is created that says if a situation requires quick action or careful observation, whether the outcome will help us or harm us. This North South East West is core to making quick decisions.
More specifically, when we say that something makes us feel an emotion, what we actually perceive is a crossroad off high or low energy, and a sensation of pleasant or unpleasant. The rest is interpreted. Sadness has a low energy unpleasant base, while anger is high energy and unpleasant. Joy is high energy and pleasant while a feeling of contentment is low energy and pleasant. There’s obvious overlap in unpleasant emotions and the difference comes down to how the brain interprets these signals to fit the situation.
Without emotions, humans are required to carefully weigh innumerable details logically. The problem is, that many of these details don’t have a value scale that can be evaluated through rigorous structures like math. There is no true or false dichotomy to evaluate them against. Yet their aggregate is judged as good or bad. Without emotion, there is no structure to judge against.
At the same time, emotions are flawed. They don’t always get the direction right. Sometimes they’re stuck in one direction or another.
For instance, the food you eat should ideally be optimized for health, and yet it isn’t. Your emotions say you want sugar and fat when nutrition says you need more fiber and antioxidants. Ideally, you should invest instead of going into debt, yet credit is a juggernaut of finance. Your mental energy should be spent productively producing resources for the future, yet we build virtual cities in video games trying to produce in game resources on a computer that can’t feed us. Boring and predictable should be favorable to excitement, yet this is seen as the death knell of a romantic relationship. Perhaps most of all, someone with abundance, like a malignant dragon, still seeks to hoard more to sleep on top of.
Stuck values that no longer serve our ability to prosper. Should this be the pinnacle of human culture? Why is this what makes us write poetry and sing songs? When a dystopia is described in crushing detail, it is bad because it ignores or forces emotion. Everything in our being rejects a fully functional society because of its effect on emotion. A society could have eliminated war, crime and interpersonal violence, but if emotion is curtailed or channeled, it is evil.
This rapid pattern recognition system that can easily misinterpret a black feline walking by as an omen of foreboding doom is also telling you that it is the most important thing in your life. The mental system that misidentified your crazy ex as being the ideal emotional partner, insists that it is the crucial factor in survival and thriving.
Why does a song feel important? Because it triggers a feeling, an emotional preference. In essence, human culture is being hijacked by a fast interpretation algorithm to generate more for itself. Every song, poem and narrative is there to give your emotional recognition guidepost system something to do because its idle and telling you that its bored. Boredom, a guidepost that it generates. It’s telling you to spend time, calories and neurons that could have gone into actual survival on memorizing songs and experiencing feelings that weren’t yours to begin with.
Is this system of emotions worthless? No, as stated, there are real efficiencies to be gained from these guideposts. A song may train your emotional system to recognize a pattern that it never had the chance to experience. A poem may teach you a new way to interpret a situation. There are real benefits to all of this rumination.
Where we fail is when we trust this quick impression system as core to who we are. It is there to push us in a direction with a somewhat good pattern identification structure. This pattern of circumstances has been good for us in the past. It has also been dangerous. These guideposts are valuable to start you moving in the right direction, but they aren’t where you should stop thinking.
Your emotions make you unrelentingly hungry. Often they make you hungry for what you don’t actually need or can even use. They are the source of all human greed. They are the source of cruelty. Your emotions reject good functional solutions to problems because they don’t “Feel” right. These are not the pinnacle of human culture. They are a useful structure that has run amok in our society, proclaiming to be the most important thing a person can attain to. A guidance mechanism that keeps pointing back to itself as the thing that should be fed with more input before all the other parts of your brain.
It’s also what motivated me to write this. Without an emotion pointing to the feeling that something was wrong, at a base level, it does not benefit me to spend time and resources on it. By considering the details of that feeling and attempting to work out the pattern that was being recognized, the structure it identified is clarified.
In general, it does not seem like people understand the process that a pattern of circumstances presents itself as an emotion generates motivation. Even more vital, that the emotion is not an irrefutable truth, it is an interpretation of partial information meant to point the more methodical parts of cognition in an appropriate direction. It is not infallible. In fact, the more we implicitly trust our emotions, the more we train them improperly.
When we act on an emotion we are telling the pattern recognition that it was right. When we do this, our brain strengthens that pattern. If the emotion guided us successfully to a good outcome, it should be strengthened. However if the emotion lead to a bad outcome, it is vital that it is not rewarded or it will continue to lead to bad outcomes.
It seems to be that this happens at the hand off point. The emotion is triggered, and then our cognition must then interpret what to do. When we start to act in accord with the emotion, that is the trigger for the initiating pattern to be strengthened. It is told “good job, you recognized the proper stance to take” and is fed more resources.
Do you see the danger? This situation requires a rejection of emotion that does not fit the situation. It requires a rejection when an emotion will bring a bad result. So how do you know when that romantic attraction is leading you to your next ex, or to a bad investment? The truth is, you can’t always. However you cognition should be telling you that you’ve been attracted to the wrong personality traits before. They seem exciting, but they lead to conflict. It should tell you that this investment says it will produce outstanding returns but you’ve seen those promises before and they were fantasies.
Your pattern recognition isn’t taking account of what you’ve learned. It is going off of the last time it saw the pattern and you said, “Good job.” The last time you saw excitement in a partner and you chose to pursue you said, “Good job.” The last time the numbers looked so good and you had to invest for fear of missing out you said, “Good job.” Your emotional pattern recognition system doesn’t know about what you learned in the meantime. It just knows it did a good job last time, it sees the same pattern and then offers the same guidepost. It’s up to your cognition to evaluate its input this time and accept or refute it.
Now layer on the feeling that your emotions are your core. Now it seems improper to refute an emotion. In this view, your emotions are who you are. The guideposts are all there is. Rejection of the guidepost is a rejection of you.
With this lens, emotions are never told that they’re wrong. It takes a life shattering situation to shake up the cognition into fighting against feeling. If you know that person that keeps making the same mistake again and again, ask yourself if its their emotions that lead them back to the same point each time. Now look at your life. What emotion is leading you back to the same point? What guidepost needs to be rejected? What does your cognition need to fight?
